Lal Arifa: The Mystic Who Belonged to All
Lal Arifa: The Mystic Who Belonged to All
A reverential reflection on Lalleshwari
Some saints belong to a tradition.
A few belong to a land.
And then there are rare beings like Lalleshwari, lovingly called Lal Ded and by many Muslims, Lal Arifa—the knower—who seemed to belong to everyone without belonging to anyone.
To say she “belonged to all” is not to reduce her into a symbol of harmony. It is to recognize a deeper spiritual fact: she did not anchor her identity in ownership. She did not present herself as a representative of a sect, nor did she defend a spiritual inheritance. She lived in such intimate alignment with truth that people from different paths saw their own highest aspiration reflected in her.
Belonging, in her case, was not social. It was existential.
Most of us belong by exclusion. We are part of something because we are not part of something else. Identity is drawn through boundary. But Lal Arifa dissolved the mechanism of boundary within herself. When there is no inner partition, outer partitions lose sharpness.
Her mysticism was not about conversion or persuasion. It was about recognition. A Shaiva devotee felt the fragrance of divine consciousness in her words. A Sufi seeker felt the pulse of surrender and knowing. Neither felt compromised. Both felt expanded.
This expansion is the key.
Lal Arifa did not shrink traditions into sameness. She expanded the individual beyond confinement. Her presence created spaciousness. In spaciousness, people do not feel threatened. They feel seen.
She carried a rare quality: accessibility without dilution. Her speech was simple enough to be understood by common villagers, yet profound enough to challenge serious seekers. She did not simplify truth to make it popular. She spoke from such depth that even the unlettered could sense authenticity.
That authenticity is what allowed her to “belong” everywhere. Not because she tried to include everyone, but because she excluded no one internally.
There is an important distinction here. Inclusion as a strategy often masks insecurity. Lal Arifa’s belonging was not strategic. It was natural. She was not seeking acceptance from communities. She was living from a centre that required no validation.
In today’s world, belonging is commodified. We join groups to feel secure, to feel aligned, to feel represented. Lal Arifa invites us to a subtler belonging—the kind that arises when you are at home in yourself. When you are inwardly at home, you can enter any space without hostility.
This is why her memory survived across traditions. People did not preserve her because she agreed with them. They preserved her because she felt honest.
Honesty is universally recognizable.
She teaches us that spirituality matures when it stops trying to win. When it stops trying to defend. When it rests in being. From that resting, compassion flows—not as obligation, but as expression.
Lal Arifa did not claim to unify people. She lived so transparently that people unified themselves around the clarity she embodied.
To approach her respectfully is to see this clearly: she was not a bridge engineered between religions. She was a well. Whoever came to draw water found refreshment according to their thirst.
And perhaps that is her most luminous lesson:
You do not need to belong to everyone.
You need to be so rooted in truth that everyone can approach without fear.
That is belonging without ownership.
Practical Daily Toolkit: Cultivating Belonging Without Boundaries
1. Inner Home Practice (Morning – 3 minutes)
Sit quietly and ask:
“If no one affirmed me today, would I still feel whole?”
Let the answer guide your posture.
2. Approach Without Agenda
In one conversation daily, release the need to convince or impress. Just listen.
3. Expand the Circle
Think of someone outside your usual group. Offer them a silent wish of well-being.
4. Drop Defensive Language
Notice when you say “my people” versus “people.” Gently widen the phrasing.
5. Evening Reflection (5 minutes)
Ask:
-
Where did I seek belonging?
-
Where did I live from belonging?



Comments
Post a Comment